Evaluation and monitoring

Measuring is improving.

In the past 25 years, Dialogic has conducted hundreds of evaluations in a political-administrative context across a wide range of policy areas. Dialogic is well-acquainted with the role of government, the legitimacy of government interventions, and the assumptions underlying government interventions (policy theory).

The text on this page was automatically translated and hence may differ from the original. No rights can be derived from this translation.

In nearly all evaluation studies, we use a mix of evaluation methods, ranging from more qualitative (such as interviews, desk research, surveys, case studies) to more quantitative and experimental (such as econometric and statistical research, quasi-experimental evaluation research, and data science).

In recent years, we have been involved in evaluations of, among others, the Innovation Box, NBTC, all NWO institutes, TO2 institutions, and specific (semi-)scientific institutions in the Netherlands and Flanders (such as Cultural Heritage Policy Framework of North Holland province, Flemish Space Economy Impulse Programme, ECOOM, KMDA, Naturalis, BioSolar Cells programme, QuTech, VITO and VLIZ). For the Ministry of Finance, we developed an accessible online handbook for conducting policy evaluations and policy reviews (the Policy Evaluation Toolbox).