The text on this page was automatically translated and hence may differ from the original. No rights can be derived from this translation.
The active disclosure of information by supervisors is rapidly evolving. Nevertheless, there has been little systematic research on this specific topic to date. It is clear, however, that significant differences exist between various supervisors in this area, and that the information disclosed is often heavily consulted by the public. Apparently, the information meets a substantial information need. Advies Overheid.nl has therefore asked Dialogic to systematically map out the differences in how different supervisors deal with the transparency of (their) information.
In addition to a comprehensive final report, a short chapter has been written for the annual Overheid.nl Monitor. This so-called Capita Selection (each year a specific topic is highlighted in addition to the regular monitoring) discusses the current state of affairs regarding the transparency of supervision information, the (im)possibilities, and best practices. Given the legal background of the discussion on whether supervision information (such as violations and fines) should be made public or not, collaboration took place with Mr. Marc de Vries.
